<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PyTorch | Jay Polra</title><link>https://jaypolra.github.io/tags/pytorch/</link><atom:link href="https://jaypolra.github.io/tags/pytorch/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>PyTorch</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Geometry-Grounded Novel-View Acoustic Synthesis</title><link>https://jaypolra.github.io/project/geometry-grounded-nvas/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jaypolra.github.io/project/geometry-grounded-nvas/</guid><description>&lt;p>Prior audio-visual methods depend on Structure-from-Motion to build geometry: expensive, brittle with sparse frames, and unavailable at inference in many real scenes.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Built a feed-forward pipeline using VGGT geometry encoding and a cross-attention decoder that routes on geometry but retrieves learned acoustic priors. No COLMAP, no target-view image required.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Key architectural decision: separate keys and values in cross-attention so visual geometry decides which reference views are relevant, but the actual retrieved information is the learned acoustic fingerprint of those views, not the visual features themselves.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Outperformed prior SOTA (AV-Cloud) on all four metrics (MAG, ENV, LRE, DPAM) with fewer parameters (3.24M vs 3.91M) and 10x faster preprocessing than COLMAP.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>VLM Explainer: From Patches to Phrases</title><link>https://jaypolra.github.io/project/vlm-explainer/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jaypolra.github.io/project/vlm-explainer/</guid><description>&lt;p>BLIP generates fluent captions but gives no account of why. The question this project answers: do the image regions the model highlights actually cause the caption, or do they just correlate with it?&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Built Grad-CAM token attribution to identify which image regions influenced specific caption words. Validated through perturbation testing: masking the dog region changed &amp;ldquo;a family walking with their dog&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;a family walking on the beach.&amp;rdquo; Causal influence, not correlation, is the standard.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Added CLIP alignment scoring to cross-verify image-text grounding. Interactive Streamlit interface with 2-click region masking and layer-evolution visualization across shallow-to-deep BLIP representations.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>